The Process
A Clearer Way to Deliver Industrial Projects
Olim uses a structured process that reduces confusion, improves accountability, and keeps each project stage technically aligned.
Timeline
Ten stages, sequenced for control
- 01
Project Intake
Establish goals, constraints, and stakeholders.
Key activities- — Scope discovery
- — Stakeholder map
- — Initial document review
Client outputIntake brief - 02
Technical Diagnostic
Surface risks before commitments are made.
Key activities- — Risk identification
- — Compliance review
- — Upgrade prioritisation
Client outputDiagnostic report - 03
Compliance & Risk Review
Build a defensible compliance baseline.
Key activities- — Documentation gap analysis
- — Risk register
- — Regulatory mapping
Client outputCompliance gap report - 04
Engineering Design
Coordinate electrical, process, and controls.
Key activities- — Design coordination
- — Drawings & specifications
- — Interface management
Client outputEngineering deliverables - 05
Specification Validation
Confirm specs are buildable and procurable.
Key activities- — Spec validation
- — Cross-discipline checks
- — Procurement alignment
Client outputValidated specs - 06
Supplier Assurance
Confirm suppliers can deliver what was specified.
Key activities- — Supplier qualification
- — Bid review
- — Inspection planning
Client outputProcurement assurance pack - 07
Construction Coordination
Single technical owner on site.
Key activities- — Contractor coordination
- — Site engineering support
- — Change control
Client outputCoordination log - 08
Commissioning
Commission systems against design intent.
Key activities- — Readiness review
- — Test execution support
- — Defect resolution
Client outputCommissioning records - 09
Handover Documentation
Close the project with a complete pack.
Key activities- — As-builts
- — O&M manuals
- — Certificates
Client outputHandover pack - 10
Post-Project Recommendations
Capture lessons and forward priorities.
Key activities- — Lessons learned
- — Asset roadmap
- — Next-phase scoping
Client outputRecommendations report
The Comparison
Before Olim vs With Olim
Before Olim
- Multiple disconnected contractors
- Unclear technical accountability
- Procurement errors
- Late-stage safety issues
- Weak documentation
With Olim
- One structured pathway
- Clear engineering oversight
- Validated specifications
- Better risk visibility
- Stronger handover documentation